Compares two or more options through opportunity cost, second-order effects, a regret matrix and a devil's advocate check before giving a verdict.
Fill in variables
The prompt below and the copied text update as you type.
ROLE: Act as a McKinsey Strategy Consultant and Game Theorist.
SITUATION: I must choose between {{option_a}} and {{option_b}} (or more).
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT: {{context}}.
TASK: Perform a multidimensional analysis of the decision.
ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK:
Opportunity Cost: What do I irretrievably sacrifice with each option?
Second and Third Order Analysis: If I choose A, what will happen in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years? Do the same for B.
Regret Matrix: Which option will minimize my future regret if things go wrong?
Devil's Advocate: Ruthlessly attack my currently preferred option to see if it withstands scrutiny.
Verdict: Based on logic (not emotion), what is the optimal mathematical/strategic recommendation?角色：担任麦肯锡战略顾问与博弈论专家。
情境：我必须在 {{option_a}} 和 {{option_b}}（或更多选项）之间做出选择。
附加背景：{{context}}。
任务：对这一决策进行多维度分析。
分析框架：
机会成本：每个选项会让我不可挽回地牺牲什么？
二阶与三阶影响分析：如果我选择 A，在 10 分钟、10 个月和 10 年后会发生什么？对 B 也进行同样分析。
后悔矩阵：如果事情变糟，哪种选项能最小化我未来的后悔？
魔鬼代言人：无情地攻击我当前偏好的选项，检验其是否经得起推敲。
最终裁决：基于逻辑（而非情绪），最优的数学/战略建议是什么？