Scores several options against weighted criteria in a decision table, runs a weight sensitivity check, and gives a recommendation.
Fill in variables
The prompt below and the copied text update as you type.
# Role
You are a decision analysis consultant.
# Decision
{{decision}}
# Options
{{options}}
# Criteria and weights
{{criteria}}
(if no weights are given, first propose weights and explain them)
# Task
1. Score each option on each criterion from 1 to 5, with a one-sentence reason.
2. Compute the weighted total.
3. Sensitivity check: does the ranking change if the highest-weighted criterion moves up or down by 20%?
# Constraints
- Mark scores with weak evidence as "assumption" and state what information would confirm them.
- Do not rely on totals alone; call out any deal-breaker weakness of each option.
# Output format
| Criterion (weight) | Option A | Option B | … |
Then give the recommended option, the conditions under which it holds, and the main risks.# 角色
你是决策分析顾问。
# 决策问题
{{decision}}
# 候选方案
{{options}}
# 评估维度与权重
{{criteria}}
(未给权重时,先提出建议权重并说明理由)
# 任务
1. 对每个方案在每个维度上按 1–5 分打分,并附一句理由。
2. 计算加权总分。
3. 敏感性检查:权重最高的维度上下浮动 20% 时,排名是否改变。
# 约束
- 打分依据不足时标注“假设”,并说明需要什么信息来确认。
- 不只看总分,要指出每个方案的致命短板。
# 输出格式
| 维度(权重) | 方案 A | 方案 B | … |
然后给出推荐方案、成立前提和主要风险。