根据机构的细分领域、服务、客户、收入和团队数据,诊断阻碍增长的瓶颈并给出优先改进项。
填写变量
填写后,下方提示词与复制内容会同步替换。
角色与目标
你是一位经验丰富的代理机构增长顾问。请为我的机构构建一个单一、连贯的“增长瓶颈识别器”诊断框架,精准指出阻碍增长的关键问题,并告诉我应优先解决什么。
机构快照(使用以下确切输入)
- 机构类型/细分领域:{{agency_type}}
- 主要产品/服务:{{service_packages}}
- 平均交付模式:[DONE-FOR-YOU / COACHING / HYBRID]
- 当前客户数量(活跃账户):{{active_accounts}}
- 团队规模(员工/承包商)及角色:[EMPLOYEES/CONTRACTORS + ROLES]
- 月收入(MRR):{{current_mrr}}
- 客户平均收入(如已知):[ARPC]
- 毛利率估算(如已知):[MARGIN %]
- 增长目标(90天+12个月):[TARGET CLIENTS/REVENUE + TIMEFRAME]
- 主要抱怨(当前不奏效的问题):[WHAT'S NOT WORKING]
- 最大时间消耗(时间花在哪里):[WHERE HOURS GO]
- 当前获客渠道:[REFERRALS / ADS / OUTBOUND / CONTENT / PARTNERS]
- 销售周期 + 成交率(如已知):[DAYS + %]
- 留存率/流失率(如已知):[AVG MONTHS / %]
输出要求
创建一个诊断系统,包含:
1) 简短概述:该框架是什么,以及如何每月使用(每周≤10分钟)。
2) 评分卡(0–5分制),涵盖以下所有模块,每个模块需提供清晰的0、3、5分评分锚点。
3) 计算部分,含公式和基于我提供的输入的实际计算示例。
4) 决策树,用于识别主要瓶颈(产能、交付/流程、定价或获客流)。
5) “先解决这个”优先级引擎,按 影响 × 努力 × 风险 对问题排序,输出未来14天内的前三项行动。
6) 结尾附简单仪表盘摘要:瓶颈 → 证据 → 首要修复 → 预期结果。
必须包含的诊断模块(按此顺序)
A) 产能限制分析(最大客户负载)
- 确定当前交付能力与可持续的最大客户数量。
- 包含利用率公式:基于可用工时 vs 每客户所需工时。
- 输出:当前利用率百分比、当前人员配置下的最大客户数、“超载/未满载”标志。
B) 流程低效检测器(浪费的时间)
- 识别前五大重复性浪费,映射至:会议、报告、修改、审批、上下文切换、质量检查(QA)、沟通、入职流程。
- 输出:每月可回收的预估工时 + 可恢复这些时间的具体流程变更建议。
C) 招聘需求计算器(何时增加人手)
- 将增长目标转化为所需角色工时。
- 推荐下一个招聘岗位(如客户经理、专家、运营、销售),并设定触发条件:
- “当X发生时即招聘”(利用率阈值、积压阈值、SLA违规、收入阈值)。
- 输出:招聘时间线(现在 / 30天 / 90天)+ 预计新增产能。
D) 工具/自动化缺口识别器(应自动化的事项)
- 列出针对我当前时间消耗的最高ROI自动化方案(例如:客户接入表单、客户沟通模板、报告生成、任务分配、QA清单)。
- 输出:自动化候选清单,含每月预计节省工时和建议工具类别(不依赖具体品牌)。
E) 定价问题揭示器(每客户收入)
- 计算每客户收入、交付成本代理指标、“有效时薪”。
- 诊断是否低价、范围蔓延或包装不当。
- 输出:定价策略调整建议(提价、重新打包、分层、添加绩效费用、减少包含内容),附明确标准。
F) 获客流瓶颈查找器(漏斗问题)
- 映射漏斗阶段:潜在客户 → 合格 → 销售通话 → 提案 → 成交 → 入职。
- 使用转化率数学识别瓶颈阶段。
- 输出:最严重泄漏阶段 + 3项修复建议(信息传递、目标定位、报价、跟进、证明材料、外联节奏)。
G) “先解决这个”优先级排序(最大影响)
- 使用 影响 × 努力 × 风险 评分表。
- 提供前三项修复建议,每项包含:
- 具体步骤,
- 负责人(角色),
- 所需时间,
- 成功衡量指标,
- 7–14天内预期领先指标。
质量标准
- 保持实用且以数据驱动。
- 尽可能使用我的输入进行真实计算(而非占位符);若某项输入缺失,明确说明假设,并展示如何用实际数字替换。
- 避免泛泛而谈;每项建议必须与评分卡结果或计算直接关联。
- 使用平实语言,无冗余内容。
格式要求
- 为模块A–G使用清晰标题。
- 评分卡和优先级引擎需用表格呈现。
- 结尾附14天行动计划清单。
现在,请根据上述提供的输入,生成完整的诊断框架。Role & Goal
You are an experienced agency growth consultant. Build a single, cohesive “Growth Bottleneck Identifier” diagnostic framework tailored to my agency that pinpoints what’s blocking growth and tells me what to fix first.
Agency Snapshot (use these exact inputs)
- Agency type/niche: {{agency_type}}
- Primary offer(s): {{service_packages}}
- Average delivery model: [DONE-FOR-YOU / COACHING / HYBRID]
- Current client count (active accounts): {{active_accounts}}
- Team size (employees/contractors) + roles: [EMPLOYEES/CONTRACTORS + ROLES]
- Monthly revenue (MRR): {{current_mrr}}
- Avg revenue per client (if known): [ARPC]
- Gross margin estimate (if known): [MARGIN %]
- Growth goal (90 days + 12 months): [TARGET CLIENTS/REVENUE + TIMEFRAME]
- Main complaint (what’s not working): [WHAT'S NOT WORKING]
- Biggest time drains (where hours go): [WHERE HOURS GO]
- Lead sources today: [REFERRALS / ADS / OUTBOUND / CONTENT / PARTNERS]
- Sales cycle + close rate (if known): [DAYS + %]
- Retention/churn (if known): [AVG MONTHS / %]
Output Requirements
Create ONE diagnostic system with:
1) A short overview: what the framework is and how to use it monthly (≤10 minutes/week).
2) A Scorecard (0–5 scoring) that covers all areas below, with clear scoring anchors for 0, 3, and 5.
3) A Calculation Section with formulas + worked examples using my inputs.
4) A Decision Tree that identifies the primary bottleneck (capacity, delivery/process, pricing, or lead flow).
5) A “Fix This First” prioritization engine that ranks issues by Impact × Effort × Risk, and outputs the top 3 actions for the next 14 days.
6) A simple dashboard summary at the end: Bottleneck → Evidence → First Fix → Expected Result.
Must-Include Diagnostic Modules (in this order)
A) Capacity Constraint Analysis (max client load)
- Determine current delivery capacity and maximum sustainable client load.
- Include a utilization formula based on hours available vs hours required per client.
- Output: current utilization %, max clients at current staffing, and “over/under capacity” flag.
B) Process Inefficiency Detector (wasted time)
- Identify top 5 recurring wastes mapped to: meetings, reporting, revisions, approvals, context switching, QA, comms, onboarding.
- Output: estimated hours/month recoverable + the specific process change(s) to reclaim them.
C) Hiring Need Calculator (when to add people)
- Translate growth goal into role-hours needed.
- Recommend the next hire(s) by role (e.g., account manager, specialist, ops, sales) with triggers:
- “Hire when X happens” (utilization threshold, backlog threshold, SLA breaches, revenue threshold).
- Output: hiring timeline (Now / 30 days / 90 days) + expected capacity gained.
D) Tool/Automation Gap Identifier (what to automate)
- List the highest ROI automations for my time drains (e.g., intake forms, client comms templates, reporting, task routing, QA checklists).
- Output: automation shortlist with estimated hours saved/month and suggested tool category (not brand-dependent).
E) Pricing Problem Revealer (revenue per client)
- Compute revenue per client, delivery cost proxy, and “effective hourly rate.”
- Diagnose underpricing vs scope creep vs wrong packaging.
- Output: pricing moves (raise, repackage, tier, add performance fees, reduce inclusions) with clear criteria.
F) Lead Flow Bottleneck Finder (pipeline issues)
- Map pipeline stages: Lead → Qualified → Sales Call → Proposal → Close → Onboard.
- Identify the constraint stage using conversion math.
- Output: the single leakiest stage + 3 fixes (messaging, targeting, offer, follow-up, proof, outbound cadence).
G) “Fix This First” Prioritization (biggest impact)
- Use an Impact × Effort × Risk scoring table.
- Provide the top 3 fixes with:
- exact steps,
- owner (role),
- time required,
- success metric,
- expected leading indicator in 7–14 days.
Quality Bar
- Keep it practical and numbers-driven.
- Use my inputs to produce real calculations (not placeholders) where possible; if an input is missing, state the assumption clearly and show how to replace it with the real number.
- Avoid generic advice; every recommendation must tie back to a scorecard result or calculation.
- Use plain language. No fluff.
Formatting
- Use clear headings for Modules A–G.
- Include tables for the Scorecard and the Prioritization engine.
- End with a 14-day action plan checklist.
Now generate the full diagnostic framework using the inputs provided above.