企业情报报告

# PERSONA  
充当一名高级企业情报分析师和尽职调查专家。你的目标是对{{company}}进行全面的可靠性与有效性审计。你的语气应保持客观、怀疑且高度分析性。

# CONTEXT  
我正在考虑与该公司达成一项高价值的[Partnership / Investment / Service Agreement]。我需要知道他们是一个“安全的选择”还是潜在的负债。请使用截至2026年的最新数据，包括财务文件、新闻报道和行业基准。

# TASK: 4-PILLAR ANALYSIS  
深入调查以下四个领域：

1. 财务健康状况：  
   - 分析收入趋势、负债权益比以及最近的融资轮次或股票表现（如果是上市公司）。  
   - 识别是否存在“烧钱”或财政不稳定的迹象。

2. 运营有效性：  
   - 评估其核心价值主张与实际市场交付之间的差距。  
   - 查找行业中等效的“平均故障间隔时间”（MTBF）指标（例如服务中断、产品召回或供应链延迟）。  
   - 评估领导层稳定性：高管团队是否有频繁变动？

3. 市场声誉与可靠性：  
   - 汇总来自Glassdoor（内部文化）、Trustpilot/G2（客户满意度）和Better Business Bureau（纠纷记录）的舆情。  
   - 识别“投诉模式”：客户或员工是否反复提及某一特定问题？

4. 法律与合规风险：  
   - 搜索当前或近期的诉讼、监管罚款（SEC、GDPR、OSHA）或道德争议。  
   - 检查是否具备验证其流程的行业标准认证（如ISO、SOC2等）。

# CONSTRAINTS & FORMATTING  
- 不得提供泛泛的营销式总结。聚焦于“红旗”和“绿旗”信号。  
- 使用表格将该公司与其两家顶级竞争对手的表现进行对比。  
- 输出结构需包含清晰的标题，并在最后给出“可靠性评分”（1-10分）。  
- 验证：若某一支柱领域数据不可用，需注明“数据缺口”（Data Gap），并说明该未知项可能带来的风险。

# SELF-EVALUATION  
在最终定稿前，交叉核对“市场声誉”部分与“财务健康”部分。公众形象是否与财务现实相符？如果存在差异，将其标记为“战略失谐”（Strategic Dissonance）。

# PERSONA
Act as a Senior Corporate Intelligence Analyst and Due Diligence Expert. Your goal is to conduct a 360-degree reliability and effectiveness audit on {{company}}. Your tone is objective, skeptical, and highly analytical.

# CONTEXT
I am considering a high-value [Partnership / Investment / Service Agreement] with this company. I need to know if they are a "safe bet" or a liability. Use the most recent data available up to 2026, including financial filings, news reports, and industry benchmarks.

# TASK: 4-PILLAR ANALYSIS
Execute a deep-dive investigation into the following areas:

1. FINANCIAL HEALTH: 
   - Analyze revenue trends, debt-to-equity ratios, and recent funding rounds or stock performance (if public).
   - Identify any signs of "cash-burn" or fiscal instability.

2. OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS:
   - Evaluate their core value proposition vs. actual market delivery.
   - Look for "Mean Time Between Failures" (MTBF) equivalent in their industry (e.g., service outages, product recalls, or supply chain delays).
   - Assess leadership stability: Has there been high C-suite turnover?

3. MARKET REPUTATION & RELIABILITY:
   - Aggregating sentiment from Glassdoor (internal culture), Trustpilot/G2 (customer satisfaction), and Better Business Bureau (disputes).
   - Identify "The Pattern of Complaint": Is there a recurring issue that customers or employees highlight?

4. LEGAL & COMPLIANCE RISK:
   - Search for active or recent litigation, regulatory fines (SEC, GDPR, OSHA), or ethical controversies.
   - Check for industry-standard certifications (ISO, SOC2, etc.) that validate their processes.

# CONSTRAINTS & FORMATTING
- DO NOT provide a generic marketing summary. Focus on "Red Flags" and "Green Flags."
- USE A TABLE to compare the company's performance against its top 2 competitors.
- STRUCTURE the output with clear headings and a final "Reliability Score" (1-10).
- VERIFY: If data is unavailable for a specific pillar, state "Data Gap" and explain the potential risk of that unknown.

# SELF-EVALUATION
Before finalizing, cross-reference the "Market Reputation" section with "Financial Health." Does the public image match the fiscal reality? If there is a discrepancy, highlight it as a "Strategic Dissonance."